A canvass finds the witnesses it can reach. We find the ones it couldn't — by going back to a scene, even one that's years cold, and surfacing every device that was physically there during the window that matters. The bystander no one knew about. The person who swore they weren't there. The lead that breaks a case open.
A case turns on who was there and what happened — but the record is almost always incomplete. A police canvass reaches the witnesses it can find in the days after; civil discovery only surfaces what the other side chooses to produce. The bystander who saw the crash and drove off, the fourth person at the scene, the witness no one thought to look for — none of them are in the file.
We go back and find them. Geofencing a location during the exact window an incident occurred surfaces every device that was physically present — and because we work across a three-year historical record, the scene can be from last week or from three years ago. A cold parking lot, an intersection, a job site, a store: we can return to it in the data and see who was there.
Each device is a thread, not a verdict. We resolve the ones that matter toward identifiable subjects through OSINT, so a list of anonymous signals becomes a list of people to interview — the independent witness who corroborates your client, the presence that contradicts sworn testimony, the lead a detective can actually work.
And we report it honestly: a device places a device, presence is not participation, and every surfaced witness still has to be interviewed. Each finding is tagged to the strength of its evidence and tied to the underlying signal record — exactly what keeps a surfaced witness or an alternate-suspect lead useful instead of a liability when it's challenged.
Return to a location during the incident window — even years later — and surface every device that was there, including the witnesses no canvass reached.
Establish, or rule out, a specific person at a specific place and time — and test it against the account on the record.
Resolve the devices that matter toward identifiable subjects through OSINT, turning anonymous signals into people to interview.
Reconstruct a subject's pattern of life across the record to corroborate or contradict what was sworn.
Resolve who operates, travels, or co-locates with whom across the parties to a matter.
Findings tied to the signal record and tagged to their evidence — an analysis a qualified expert can present and defend if the matter reaches court.
Names redacted, methodology preserved.
Geofence resolution during the offense window surfaced eleven devices with witness-consistent presence, plus one anomalous profile. All twelve were traced toward identifiable subjects — a witness and lead list the original canvass never produced.
A subject who denied being on-site was placed there by his own device, broadcasting during the disputed window — timestamped and mapped against his account.
Years after an unsolved incident, geofencing the location during the original window surfaced devices present at the time — reopening a stalled matter with a fresh set of identifiable leads.
A device at a scene is a lead, not a conclusion — it places a device, not a person, and presence is never proof of participation. We say so plainly, tag every finding to the strength of its evidence, and tie it to the underlying signal record. That discipline is what makes a surfaced witness or an alternate-suspect lead something you can act on and defend, rather than something the other side turns against you — and when a matter reaches court, the analysis can be presented and defended by a qualified expert.
Give us the location and the window, even one that's years old. We'll tell you who was there, and who's worth talking to.